Politics and Gambling 2015: Match Made in Heaven or Arranged Marriage?

Politics and gambling were front and center into the 2015 landscape. Hillary Clinton is the favorite to end up being the Democrat nominee for the 2016 election that is presidential and her stance on gaming is still a little murky.

Politics and gambling are quite similar in theory. Both involve strategizing and calculating, using odds under consideration, and deciding exactly how to proceed in the best interest of a person’s self.

In terms of politicians addressing the presssing issue of gambling, the topic becomes a bit more complex. Lawmakers understand that casinos bring the risk of increased tax revenues that translate to extra monies that could fund state governments that are currently struggling to produce ends meet.

Republicans and Democrats seldom acknowledge anything in today’s divisive political climate, and when it comes to gambling, these hardened foes aren’t exactly certain where to face. Perhaps because online gaming, in particular, is neither liberal nor conservative, but a small amount of each, there’s no cut that is clear, regardless of your party or viewpoint.

With all that in head,we have a look straight back on this past year’s battles with politics and gambling, and what seems to lie ahead in 2016.

The Race for 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

It’s shaping up to be Hillary Clinton versus the still-uncertain GOP nominee next November. Whether it is Donald Trump, Dr. Ben Carson, Florida Senator Marco Rubio or another Republican candidate, something is almost for several, and that’s Clinton will be their opponent.

Hillary Clinton

Hillary’s past in regards to gambling is just a bag that is rather mixed. Then-New York Senator Clinton voted in favor for the Unlawful Web Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) of 2006, a bill that essentially made online betting illegal.

But, 2 yrs later on, Clinton said she was in favor of investigating exactly how online gambling can be properly regulated. The front that is democratic hasn’t addressed the appearing concerns of daily fantasy sports (DFS) as of yet.

Donald Trump

The surprising GOP leader is unsurprisingly perhaps gambling’s bet that is best for expansion of casinos, both land-based and online. As being a casino that is former himself, the Donald probably will do small or nothing to block any federal legislation that would restrict states’ rights from determining their particular gaming legislation.

Marco Rubio

Rubio has issued views that are rather contrasting gambling. The first-term senator co-sponsored the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA) in 2015, a bill that would outlaw all types of on the web gambling.

However, he also hinted this October that RAWA might need an amendment for online poker, as it has elements of skill, but he is remained steadfast against expanding gambling at land-based venues.

Dr. Ben Carson

The former Johns Hopkins neurosurgeon has remained quiet in the issue of gambling, and since he has no political or background that is gambling their record is vacant.

Speaker Paul Ryan

Though House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wisconsin) isn’t an advocate for gambling or online casinos, he isn’t necessarily against the marketplace. The nine-term congressman opted not to vote on UIGEA in 2006 and in addition selected not to sign RAWA even though 21 of his Republican colleagues did.

The main one concern with Ryan among gambling supporters is the fact that he is employed Dave Hoppe as his chief of staff. Hoppe is a Washington, DC, lobbyist who’s got worked on behalf of billionaire Sheldon Adelson.

Sheldon’s Crusade

No man ended up being more active in 2015 political gambling legislation than billionaire and long-time GOP supporter Sheldon Adelson. The Las Vegas Sands president is no stranger to politics or Congress, and definitely knows what the expression ‘money talks’ is all about.

Worth roughly $30 billion, Sheldon’s made it his mission that is personal to online casinos by utilizing their political clout among GOP lawmakers to push RAWA in the Senate and House of Representatives.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) and Senator Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) obliged and introduced the bill to their particular chambers, though it’s generated action that is little. Don’t expect RAWA to magically soon disappear anytime, the billionaire stating he’ll spend ‘whatever it will take’ to stop Internet gambling. But it doesn’t appear to be threatening the shutdown of the three states that are legal either.

2016 will be a year that is important only due to the impending presidential election, but in component as a result of the rise of day-to-day fantasy contests. The return of PokerStars to nj will also bring added attention to online gaming.

RAWA in 2015: The Long and Winding Road That Led to Confusion and Contention

Billionaire Sheldon Adelson is funding the RAWA journey, and even though the legislation idled in 2015, the excursion will continue after the brand new Year. (Image: politico.com)

RAWA endured a long 2015 campaign in which the legislation that aims to block all forms of online gambling failed to gain much momentum in Congress, despite several lawmakers advocating on its behalf.

Formally known as the Restoration of America’s Wire Act, RAWA was first introduced within the Senate and House of Representatives in March of 2014 by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) and Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah).

The bill was mainly overshadowed in Washington, DC, during its initial introduction as elected leaders inside the Beltway were focused on the so-called ‘cromnibus,’ a head-scratching emergency bill that fundamentally funded the American federal government in 2015.

Graham and Chaffetz reportedly attempted to slide RAWA into the cromnibus package, but the bill ultimately passed free of any gambling legislation.

RAWA’s beat in 2014 don’t hamper its proponents’ motivation for this year’s legislative calendar. Supported by billionaire Sheldon Adelson, the $30 billion Las Vegas Sands owner who desperately wants online casinos outlawed, Graham and Chaffetz as soon as again introduced the proposal with their chambers.

Chaffetz’s Hearing Help

Following a February presentation of RAWA, Chaffetz used his sitting on the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations to put on a hearing that is formal the pros and cons of giving Internet betting into prohibition.

The committee invited five witnesses to testify, but it absolutely was evident right away the majority was in benefit of RAWA. University of Illinois Law Professor John Kindt even stole a relative line directly from Adelson when he said, ‘Click your phone, lose your house … click your mouse, lose your house.’

Exactly What coverage that is little RAWA hearing received was rather negative, media pundits distinguishing the bias among the invitees. That led to Chaffetz finally failing to gain much help from his House peers, RAWA basically being shelved into the aftermath.

Graham’s Bad Timing

Timing is everything, and Graham’s decision to re-enter RAWA in to the Senate arrived at what was perhaps the absolute most time that is ill-advised sc politician could have chosen.

On the day before nine victims of the Charleston, South Carolina, shooting were laid to rest, Graham quietly reintroduced RAWA.

Poker Players Alliance Executive Director John Pappas condemned the action saying, ‘we think I speak for most Americans when I express profound dissatisfaction in Senator Graham for selecting this time to advance a bill for the only advantage of a billionaire political donor.’

Graham’s bill has sat quietly ever since, attracting more dust within the halls associated with the US Capitol than White House china that is fourth-tier.

The DFS Factor

RAWA is thought to have predominantly struggled in 2014 and much of the previous 12 months because the topic of online gambling simply was not relevant enough for middle-of-the-road politicians to tackle. But that might have changed now, thanks to fantasy that is daily (DFS).

DFS was already outlawed by Nevada and brand New York, and numerous other states are currently thinking the legality of the contests. Should Congress intervene, that could theoretically open the floodgates for additional gaming that is anti-online.

In Memorium, Almost

Finally, both a House Oversight and Government Reform (OGR) meeting on Dec. 9th and a failure (once once again) to add RAWA in an end-of-year investing bill means that RAWA may live to see a later date in 2016, but probably it will likely be gasping for breath and on A adelson-funded heart-lung machine.

The 2015 Online Gambling State-by-State Review: A Lot Of Talk, Not Much Action

On the web gambling was once again a topic that is active state and federal lawmakers, and also as the discourse continues, billionaire Sheldon Adelson continues his efforts to fight it down. (Image: Jeff Scheid/Las Vegas Review-Journal)

Online gambling earned plenty of floor time in state capitols around the world’s 50 states in 2015.

The motion was fueled by a select few who believe legalizing Internet betting could provide substantial revenue increases for state projects while also protecting citizens and adolescents from accessing rogue overseas sites. These legislators then persuaded colleagues to open an ear.

On the other hand of this issue ended up being powerful vegas casino billionaire Sheldon Adelson funding political action committees and pressuring federal lawmakers to stop the market that is growing.

The dubious subject of ending prohibition that is online 47 of the 50 states had been often discussed, but never caused it to be out of the park. Here is a state-by-state recap of what happened over the last 12 months.

Who Did What

California: The Golden State would provide a boost that is beneficial internet poker and online gambling, but America’s many populated state idled regarding its passage in 2015. Several bills were introduced, however a complicated battlefield between lawmakers, Native Americans, and racetracks resulted in deadlock.

Pennsylvania: The Keystone State seems poised to end up being the 4th state with legalized iGambling in 2016. Led by State Rep. John Payne (R-District 106), the Republican-controlled legislature might have to legalize in order to combat Democrat Governor Tom Wolf’s increased spending.

Texas: The sun seems to be rising regarding gambling that is online the state for which poker’s most popular game was named. The Texas lottery reached out to Delaware to learn more about its market in late October. Congressman Joe Barton (R) has long been in support of legalizing iPoker, and it seems to be gaining momentum.

Massachussetts: No state did more regarding gambling at land-based casinos in 2015 than Massachusetts. The Plainridge Park Casino opened in June, while the MGM Springfield and Wynn Everett are under construction. But on line gambling remains a no-go for now.

New Hampshire: In April, state lawmakers greatly shot down yet another bill to authorize land-based casinos. iPoker fans in the ‘Live Free or Die’ state have little to be worked up about, charitable poker games also drawing scrutiny in 2015.

Wisconsin: Badgers will continue waiting to play poker outside a Wisconsin judge upholding their state’s poker ban by citing a 1964 ruling.

Michigan: The Spartan State has a history that is long of gambling, but that isn’t the way it is with online casinos. A Michigan State University study discovered that the continuing state would benefit from legalizing the industry, but lawmakers have been weary to proceed.

Nevada and Delaware: Two states that legalized on the web gaming before 2015, Nevada and Delaware attempted to breathe life into their struggling iPoker sites by formally establishing an interstate compact. The pact hasn’t solved the issues of player liquidity as hoped, however.

Florida: The Sunshine State has long been targeted by commercial casino operators for its population that is high of, but elected leaders have repeatedly knocked down efforts to lessen the monopoly on gaming native tribes possess. On line gambling seems to be an even longer shot for passage.

September New Jersey: The only other state with Nevada and Delaware to offer legal and regulated online gaming, New Jersey has its market positioned for a monstrous 2016 after it granted PokerStars an operating license in late. The Garden State is also attempting https://casino-online-australia.net/club-player-casino-review/ to legalize sports that are traditional, a lawsuit set to be heard in February of next year.

Brand New York: The Empire State was running towards its very own authorization of on the web gambling in 2015 until daily fantasy sports (DFS) exploded. With multiple bills presented, all gaming legislation took a back seat once New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman pressed to make DFS illegal in his state. Which brings us to…